To completely misquote Ron Burgundy, “I love books. Books-y, books, books. Here it goes down, down into my belly.” Okay, the last half of that mis-quote didn’t make any sense, but you get the point, I love to read. You can check the ever changing I Just Read and I Am Reading book sections on my blog’s sidebar (over there —>)to see what I’m currently enjoying and what I just finished enjoying. I thought about including what books I have “on deck” ready to be read in that sidebar, but really, it’s a crap shoot what gets picked up to be read next. There’s no guarantee what I put there will, in fact, come next.
Anywho, sometimes I get on reading tangents where I want to knock out a few books that “the man” considers “classics”. Stuff I never got to read while in school, or something I did read in school that I remember liking, but don’t remember a thing about it. These are usually fun tangents and it’s allowed me to discover books like The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas, which I never read in school, but is FANTASTIC (why the hell didn’t I read that in school?). However, there are some classics that I should read, but there’s no way in hell I’m going to read. Books by authors like Bronte, Joyce and Austen, while considered classics by “people in the know”, are considered flowery, boring and gay by “me”. If I fall asleep reading the synopsis on the back of the book, then there is little hope the ENTIRE book is going to keep my interest. So there was a whole section of classic literature that I avoided and I was fine with that. Until savant/genius/author Seth Graham-Smith decided he too thought classic literature needed a little help in being “less literary” and “more AWESOME”. Thusly was Pride & Prejudice & Zombies birthed upon our virgin world.
Graham-Smith infuses a subplot involving a battle with the undead into the literary classic thereby making it relevant to guys everywhere. I mean, what good is a literary classic if NO ONE wants to read it? Seriously. Besides, what is more romantic than fighting off an army of the undead? It’s okay if you can’t come up with an answer to that question, there isn’t an answer other than ‘NOTHING’.
So, I thought, in what other books would this work? The possibilities are endless. So I sat down at my desk at work….um, I mean the table at home, after I got off work….and came up with a few more twists on some boring classic literature books that would get me to read them. Come enjoy the awesome-ness with me.
Original Synopsis – Follows the lives of the four March sisters as they live, love and learn their way through life. It’s an allegorical novel that champions the strength of women during a time in America when women weren’t considered strong.
New More AWESOME Synopsis – The four March sisters, Jo, Meg, Beth and Amy, are always fighting. One day, a fight promoter, James Lawrence, happens upon one of their more viscous fights and gets an idea. Guys everywhere would pay to see these ladies just go at it in an all out battle royal. Mr Lawrence talks to the girls’ father and, having recently lost a good amount of the family’s money, he agrees to let Mr Lawrence train the girls for a traveling “girl fight” festival. The promoter recruits a few other girls from the nearby area and trains them in boxing and Greco-Roman wrestling. The girls then tour the country side with Mr Lawrence, fighting in a 10 woman battle royal 6 nights a week. The story follows the girls across the country as they live in the festival caravan and fight, love and learn in various small towns across 19th century America. This new version also shows the strength of women…in revealing clothing…in non-sanctioned bloody cage matches. Movie rights are pending.
Continue reading →
Cavalcade of Awesome 